Suppose half of the sectors of the economy grow forever at 4%, while the rest completely stagnate. I’m strongly tempted to say that this economy’s growth rate equals 2% forever. Anyone tempted to disagree? If so, why?
Before you answer: Would it matter if the 4%-growth sectors were all in “virtual reality” – and the stagnant sectors were for actual food, shelter, cars, etc.? If it matters, why does it matter?
The post appeared first on Econlib.
If half of the sectors are growing and half are not, the "better" half will become a larger and larger fraction of the economy. So the growth rate of the overall economy will asymptotically approach 4%.
I know nothing about macro but that sounds unlikely, but that's still how I interpret your question.
The growth rate will gradually approach 4% as that sector more and more dominates. And no, it doesn’t matter, economically, if the growth sector is virtual (however defined).