Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Parkite's avatar

Agree with everything you said, but I always have felt the major missing component here is the value of a year-of-life.

This is where the young are infinitely more wealthy than the old. You can do the math around a set of discounted QALYs to actually calculate this or you could just intuitively think about it - how much of their "net worth" would a 70 year old offer to be 20 again? This becomes particularly salient if you think about the longevity advances we are about to see. Any rational 70 year old deca-millionaire would give up almost every dollar to be a 20 year old again in 2026.

Garrett MacDonald's avatar

Scott Sumner over the years has written a lot of posts on wealth vs income vs consumption inequality and by age. A lot of the animosity towards high wealth people is really young spendthrifts being mad at old savers

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?