Larry White’s The Clash of Economic Ideas pointed me to a wonderful short essay by Joshua Muravchik. In it, Muravchik makes the most original observation about socialism I’ve encountered in years:
He [“Utopian socialist” Robert Owen] was no obscure crank. When he arrived in the United States in 1824, he was received by a joint session of Congress that met over two separate days with outgoing President Monroe and incoming President John Quincy Adams, among the many luminaries who came to hear him out.
Owen then bought an already developed settlement on the banks of the Wabash River from a religious sect. The members of this group had developed it, and it included not only homes but vast fertile farmlands and more than twenty highly productive workshops that produced goods sold all across the country. Yet within a year after taking it over, Owen and his thousand followers had turned this little Switzerland into an Albania. All the other collective settlements, except for some that were first and foremost religious communities, had similar histories of failure.
But along came Marx and Engels, who wiped this record of failure away with one of the great intellectual conjuring tricks of all time. Owen and his ilk, said Marx and Engels, were utopians. What we needed instead was scientific socialism, which they then outfitted with great pseudo-scholarly paraphernalia: means and modes of production, historical forces, class struggle, and all the rest.
What I mean by conjuring trick is this: Owen and the other so-called utopians had an idea. What did they do? Owen and the other communitarians actually created experiments to test their ideas. Experimentation is the very essence of science. They were the real scientific socialists. Marx and Engels dismissed all experimental evidence, replaced it with an idea that was sheer prophecy, and claimed thereby to have progressed from utopia to science.
Until now, I’d always thought that despite his pretensions, Marx was no better than the Utopian socialists. Now I realize that this was entirely unfair. Marx was decidedly inferior to his “Utopian” rivals. They were wrong, but at least they had the common sense and common decency to beta test their radical proposals on a small scale with consenting subjects.
The post appeared first on Econlib.
We could think of existing governments as experiments, but then we would need to throw out most of experimental method and ethics. Real experiments need a control group, and ethical experiments use voluntary subjects.