Bringing your skill and work ethic into the Shining City will disadvantage, at the very least, those already-there not able or willing to exceed your virtues.
Good for you (and your employer), bad for natives of lesser endowment. They'll (unwillingly) form a dispossessed underclass that grows as your skillful, hard-working relatives follow you in.
This is an intriguing and informative critique/deconstruction Bryan. I was never a huge Reagan fan, but for reasons unrelated to the substance discussed here. I do think he genuinely believed in the “Shining City on the Hill,” and knew that the metaphor was meaningless if one could not get in.
Lip service is better not-even-lip-service. It at least provides a rhetorical foundation to build on and a vision of the ideal.
Reagan had good instincts, limited political abilities, and was poor at picking people to implement his good instincts.
Still, overall, far better than most presidents.
This link doesn't work:
But the more specific the question, the more statist Americans look.
Bringing your skill and work ethic into the Shining City will disadvantage, at the very least, those already-there not able or willing to exceed your virtues.
Good for you (and your employer), bad for natives of lesser endowment. They'll (unwillingly) form a dispossessed underclass that grows as your skillful, hard-working relatives follow you in.
This is an intriguing and informative critique/deconstruction Bryan. I was never a huge Reagan fan, but for reasons unrelated to the substance discussed here. I do think he genuinely believed in the “Shining City on the Hill,” and knew that the metaphor was meaningless if one could not get in.