Discussion about this post

User's avatar
arprin's avatar

You said that you agree with Hanania that women's tears have too much power, because progress has to be doen by saying offensive things, and mentioned the theory of evolution as example. I'm stunned by this. Do you think women's tears would have stopped the theory of evolution?

Ultimately, what Hanania referred to was that you can't say blacks are more violent, trans are insane and women are illogical, that's what supposedly "in danger." But I don't see how this would hinder progress? Will AI progress not be made because you can't call trans insane on colleges? This is just absurd. And I don't see how it's even true that women are more emotional on average, I mean the very emotional reactions of many men to the term "toxic masculinity" (Gillette lost billions) shows that many men get offended easily, too (disclaimer: I don't think the term is good, still was never offended by it). If anything, there is more academic freedom today, as we literally had segregation until the 60s.

I really don't think that blaming women's tears for, well, I don't even know, somehow "lack of progress" (?), is anything based on reality. It looks more like another anti-woman rant from someone who confessed that he wanted to enslave women when he was young because of his sexual frustration (Hanania) and then just accepted as truth from someone who still thinks of women as "neurotic" and "hypersensitive" (Caplan).

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts