Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kenny Easwaran's avatar

Isn't the best explanation just that Republicans have a distribution about how high the minimum wage should be, that is clustered around $9-10 an hour? Almost all of them favor small increases, and a majority even favor an increase to $11 over the status quo of $7, but when given a choice between $7, $11, and $15, more of them prefer $7 than either of the other two (though nearly as many prefer $11, and even one in six prefer $15).

Democrats also have a distribution of opinions about the minimum wage (about a third prefer $11 to $15, and some even prefer $7), but their distribution seems to be centered somewhere just above $15.

I suspect that if we break down the polling on the basis of party and local cost of living, that for each party, people living in high cost of living areas will be on the higher end for members of their party for what they think the federal minimum wage should be, while people living in low cost of living areas will be on the lower end of the distribution within their party. Given that Republicans tend to live in low cost of living areas, and Democrats tend to live in high cost of living areas, this shrinks the gaps between the parties even more.

The data you have presented here make me think, quite surprisingly, that there is actually very *little* remaining difference of opinion on the basis of party membership, once we factor in where a person lives. Somehow this issue has become much *less* partisan, rather than Republicans turning against it.

Expand full comment
Jose Pablo's avatar

"What’s going on? Rising polarization is the obvious story. Mutual animosity is so strong that Republicans will oppose archetypal feel-good legislation like the minimum wage because they know that Democrats support it."

Polarization sure plays a part, but I don't think it is the main reason. What I think happens is that the "feel good" effect depends heavily on the amount of the minimum wage. At $11 workers "deserve it" (even in the Republicans mind) so a) sounds fair and b) is still far away from the amount these voters are earning themselves. $15 on the other hand sounds anti-business and is closer to what this same voters' earn. Afterall, the limit to supporting "feeling good" legislation is that the benefits to the constituency at play allows these underserved, God forbid, to catch-up with the "feeling good" voters.

One of the mysteries of minimum wage legislation is that if people believe the government can set the minimum wage with limited economic consequences, why not setting it at $1,000?

Following from this, I think it would be interesting to see the differences in polling answers if the question is framed in a different light. Something along the lines of: do you think that for teenagers, illegal immigrants and x, y ... workers, the minimum wage should be $11? or do you think that for teenagers, illegal immigrants and x, y ... workers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi (states with a higher percent of minimum wage workers) the minimum wage should be $11? (When polling voters from out of this States)

I am curious about the effect of the "reframing".

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts