Discussion about this post

User's avatar
name12345's avatar

> Rothbardians have a terrible track record of identifying the lesser of two evils, even when the gap in their evil is vast

I think many Rothbardians are arguing that the gap in evil is about the same or worse for the Ukraine: Supposedly, the U.S. spent $5 billion to foment the 2014 coup d'état (in which the U.S.'s Victoria Nuland was caught on audio pushing who should be the new leader, and that person ended up being the leader), which then led to an attempt by the Donbas to rebel and that led to tens of thousands of deaths (according to the U.N.) through the evil of bombardment by the Ukrainian state over 8 years. I haven't seen casualty numbers for the Russia/Ukraine war higher than that yet.

Most Rothbardians I've heard argue about this are primarily anti-U.S. imperialism and anti-Ukrainian suppression of Donbas/Crimea. They're also anti-Putin but they're just arguing that it's strange to have a one-side view on the conflict.

By analogy, the view I've heard of most can be analogized to Osama bin Laden: Harry Browne and Ron Paul weren't pro-bin Laden, nor were they not anti-bin Laden; they were just simply pointing out that U.S. imperialism is a primary driving force of the evil of bin Laden, and, arguably, the evils of U.S. imperialism are larger, in total.

Expand full comment
David R. Henderson's avatar

Great analysis!

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts