6 Comments
User's avatar
Peter Coy's avatar

Another problem with the Tiebout model is that in most states, corporate income taxes are levied in proportion to the share of a company's revenue that's earned in the state. So moving offices out of a high-tax state won't cut a company's tax liability.

Ddsdsdsd's avatar

I think it's because it implies that taxes are the same as paying yourself for a good while we know that taxes are not 100% local? In that case public school would be like paying for private school, while in reality we know that it always "feels" subsidized by someone else.

Second I think it is because when you join a neighborhood you join a club, with many amenities not only a school, you can't select for certain amenities and take away public schools, you have like 120 clubs you can join in a city and they are mostly separable in 2 or 3 types of clubs.

The Steamroller's avatar

Ok, so we see in practice that municipalities aren't like total free market competitors with each other ... but hwhy not?

kn's avatar

Maybe we can promote competition through performance appraisal?

Chartertopia's avatar

IANAE! My first reaction was, what planet does this guy live on where people can move that easily? Your economist objections seem perfectly cromulent too, but again, IANAE :-)